Letter: Britain must not rush into PR system

Michael Elliott Mep
Wednesday 28 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Donald Macintyre, in "A good time to help Ashdown and start on PR" (23 May), overlooks the key point that there is a multitude of different proportional representation voting systems in use world-wide, and many even within the European Union. The work of the Boundary Commission in drawing up new European constituencies for 1999, based on groups of the recently revised House of Commons seats, is now well advanced; unless we were to adopt one specific PR system without prior public debate and consultation, it is hard to see how such a fundamental change could be introduced in time.

The impression is sometimes given that PR is a brand new idea, when in reality it has been around a long time and a number of countries that originally adopted a PR voting system have subsequently reverted, at least partially, to first-past-the-post elections. Like a great many people I believe we should be very cautious before we abandon the traditional link between an elected member and an individual constituency, in any type of election. The constituency link ensures everyone has "their own" MP and imposes on elected members a degree of commitment and accountability to the electorate that most forms of PR do not, and that party list systems certainly fail to do.

The Labour Party has made a manifesto commitment to conduct a referendum on whether people in Britain want a change to a PR form of voting and to precede this by setting up an independent Electoral Commission to advise on alternative systems to our present one. This fair and reasonable approach should apply not only to the House of Commons, but to the European Parliament and local councils as well. If we avoid rushing into a possibly unwise form of PR for the European elections in 1999, then it could be introduced, after thorough preparation, for the elections in 2004.

MICHAEL ELLIOTT MEP

(London West, Lab)

London W13

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in