LETTER : Boot camps do not work

Stephen Shaw
Friday 19 April 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is difficult to know whether to laugh or cry at the planned use of the Colchester military corrective training centre as a boot camp for young offenders. Boot camps make great television for politicians wishing to look tough, but successive research studies have shown that tactics designed to train soldiers for war are not an effective way of rehabilitating juvenile delinquents.

Colchester does currently enjoy a low reconviction rate. But this is for two specific reasons. First, most of those sent there have committed offences (like the use of soft drugs) which would not result in a prison sentence in the civilian courts. Second, the regime at Colchester offers an excellent, relevant and intensive training course for servicemen and women who are to return to their units. Neither of these factors apply to young offenders.

During the early 1980s, the present government introduced the so-called "short, sharp shock", a similar package of macho strutting and paramilitary bombast. It was abandoned because magistrates increasingly opted for more constructive penalties, and because the Home Office's own evaluation showed that the shock programme did not work. Taxpayers' money should not be wasted repeating this folly.

Stephen Shaw

Director

Prison Reform Trust

London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in