Letter: Booker judges who chose Swift haven't changed their minds
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
As Judges of the 1996 Booker Prize, our memories of the final judges meeting differ from A N Wilson's ("The Sound and the Fury", 16 March). We are surprised, in particular, by his assertion that Margaret Atwood was Graham Swift's "only rival" for the prize at any stage in the meeting. All of the books on the shortlist had their strong admirers, but A N Wilson must surely remember that it was Seamus Deane's novel Reading in the Dark which came up most often in our final discussions, and which eventually lost out to Last Orders on a 3-2 vote. Choosing a winner by majority vote is normal practice among Booker panels, and the three judges who voted for Graham Swift stand by their decision.
For authors' sakes, the process by which the Booker panel reaches its verdict is meant to be private. We write simply to correct inaccurate disclosure.
Carmen Callil, A L Kennedy,
Ian Jack, Jonathan Coe
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments