Letter: Bomber Harris: missions accomplished, targets missed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read with some interest Tom Wilkie's article examining the policy of area bombing during the Second World War ('Massacre by miscalculation', 9 August), but I feel that the author has missed clearly addressing the issue of culpability.
The reason that organisations such as the Bomber Command Association are often unhappy with programmes such as Death by Moonlight (7 August, shown as part of the Channel 4 series, The Valour and the Horror) lies in the way that Air Marshal 'Bomber' Harris is held responsible for the policy of area bombing. Harris was held in high regard by bomber crews, and criticism of him is viewed as implied criticism of themselves. Bomber air crews suffered considerable losses and it is self-evident that those who experienced such terrible losses will not want to see them as having been in vain.
Harris was a supporter of area bombing and it was because of this that he was promoted to head Bomber Command in 1942. In other words, area bombing was official policy from Churchill down, and someone favourable to that policy was chosen to direct Bomber Operations.
By raising these points I am not trying to make excuses. Area bombing was a policy that was morally wrong. However, when making historical judgement it is wise to try to include as many of the facts as possible, as well as to try to have some appreciation of how the situation appeared at the time to those involved.
Yours sincerely,
STEPHEN TRAVIS
Bath
10 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments