LETTER : Blurred rhythms of relativism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Andy Hamilton
Sir: Helen Wilkinson attacks Dr Nick Tate's defence of "high culture" as "elitist" ("You can't separate Blur from Schubert", 9 February). But is it elitist to argue that a diet of chart pop and soap operas with none of what is traditionally called "high culture" is an impoverished one, and something that schools should try to rectify?
Of course popular culture has "value in its own right", but the biggest enemy is not high-cultural elitism, but unthinking relativism that, for instance, equates Kylie Minogue and Jimi Hendrix. There is another term for the idea that there is no genuine aesthetic value, and that is philistinism.
Yours sincerely,
Andy Hamilton
Department of Philosophy
University of Durham
Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments