LETTER : Blurred rhythms of relativism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Alan Pavelin
Sir: There is nothing wrong with asking the question whether or not Schubert is better than Blur. What is wrong is to suggest that it is a meaningless question. I prefer the approach of the late F. R. Leavis, who believed that you should forcefully make your case about a particular work and then ask "This is so, is it not?", inviting a reasoned and constructive response.
Yours faithfully,
Alan Pavelin
Chislehurst, Kent
9 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments