Letter: Blowing hot and cold on Celsius
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I feel your item on the Fahrenheit v Celsius debate ("Whatever happened to Fahrenheit?", 30 November) may have underestimated the guile of the British public in subverting attempts at standardisation.
Rather than reject Celsius outright, we have merged it with our beloved Fahrenheit scale, for greater conversational effect. Thus, in summer we use Fahrenheit because the numbers are higher ("90 in the shade yesterday, old boy"), and in the winter we use Celsius because the numbers are lower ("Do you know it went down to minus 10 last night?").
Since the numbers in the middle refer to perfectly ordinary weather which no one wants to talk about, we can pull off this trick with ease, and defy anyone who tries to change it.
BRIAN HACKETT
Denby Dale, West Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments