Letter: Blair's blurred vision of Britain
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Tony Blair has pledged to legislate for a Scottish parliament in Labour's first year of power ('Tony Blair's First Day', 23 July), but has he thought this policy through?
If we have Scottish devolution before English regional government, then how can Scotland justify having as many MPs as it does? If Scotland is to have the privilege of a separate parliament, then this should be balanced with a reduced representation in the House of Commons. However, a smaller number of anti-Tory Scottish MPs would probably lead to a Conservative majority in any following general election under the first-past-the-post voting system.
If Labour did not reduce the number of Scottish MPs, we can be sure that any succeeding Conservative government would, thus ensuring that they would win any future election.
English devolution has many merits, but would be even more controversial than the present local government review. No government could be certain that the legislation would pass through a single parliament unscathed. If Labour introduces Scottish devolution, it must either introduce English devolution at the same time (to be certain not to get one without the other) or it must introduce electoral reform. To do otherwise would be to risk giving England to the Conservative Party for decades to come.
Yours faithfully,
GEORGE KENDALL
Maidenhead
23 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments