Letter: Beware the hearts that bleed for Bosnia

Mr Correlli Barnett
Tuesday 29 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Many of the quotations from the assorted great and good about possible large-scale military intervention in the former Yugoslavia (16 December) demonstrate how far the chattering classes have been affected by uncontrollable bleeding of the heart. The object of the foreign policy and grand strategy of a state is to further its prosperity and security. Neither of these desirables is at risk in the former Yugoslavia.

Facile parallels are sometimes drawn between the case of Yugoslavia today and Czechoslovakia in 1938. But at stake in 1938 was the entire strategic balance in Europe between an expansionist Nazi Germany and the forces of democracy. No such issue is at stake in Yugoslavia. It cannot therefore be argued that the plight of the Bosnians is a British or EC interest, warranting the commitment of large military forces to an open-ended campaign in mountainous country.

However, we stand in more general danger of being seduced by cant phrases such as 'the world community' or 'the new world order', not least because of the busy-bodying of the United Nations organisation, which has already sucked European troops into Cambodia and Somalia, neither of which constitutes a European interest.

There is no world community or new world order, as objective assessments of the facts must serve to demonstrate.

There is only a world arena of rivalry and conflict, in which the principles of Karl von Clausewitz or the practices of Lord Palmerston serve as better guides than woolly idealism and a bleeding heart.

Yours faithfully,

CORRELLI BARNETT

Churchill College

Cambridge

17 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in