Letter: Beverly Allitt: the necessity of a public inquiry and a syndrome that can be used as an excuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The particular horror of the Beverly Allitt affair, involving the perpetration of such heartless violence to small and helpless children right beneath the eyes of their trusting parents, touches us all the more deeply because it occurred in what should have been a haven of sanctuary for children.
In the aftermath, we should perhaps beware that hindsight does not render us self-righteous in our indignant pursuit of those people who failed to foresee or prevent these dreadful events.
This crime was so rare, bizarre and awful as to be almost beyond the imaginings of any sane mind. The hospital management that did not make provision for such a crime should at least be entitled to a little sympathy from us all.
That having been said, however, there appear to have been major failures in management that need to be investigated publicly, particularly the lack of communication between various hospital staff. In recent years it has become increasingly common for hospitals to impose contracts of employment on clinical staff that forbid the unauthorised transmission of information on pain of disciplinary action or dismissal. Doctors and nurses are thus unable either to express proper criticism or voice their fears of mismanagement or inappropriate patient care.
This muzzling of even senior medical staff goes far beyond the normal professional rules of patient confidentiality. It would seem likely that such regulations, designed for the convenience of hospital management, are liable to produce just the failures of communication that have so tragically dogged these events. Only a public inquiry where witnesses are compelled to divulge facts even in breach of their contract with management will enable a full assessment of these failures to be made.
Anything less than a public inquiry would, however assiduously undertaken, leave staff, parents and the public at large deeply mistrustful of the outcome.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS LEACH
General Practitioner
East Farndon
Northamptonshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments