Letter: Beverly Allitt: the necessity of a public inquiry and a syndrome that can be used as an excuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: A great deal of attention, rightly, will be focused on the culpability of those who allowed Beverly Allitt to become and to continue as a nurse. However, an equally important issue, which may be lost from sight and which is relevant to all criminal behaviour, is that of the offender's responsibility.
Does the Munchhausen syndrome mitigate or excuse? Does the fact that a crime is committed by an alcoholic justify leniency in punishment? What about PMT? Every crime is committed as a result of psycho-psychological processes. These, in turn, result from hereditary or environmental factors over which the offender may have had no control.
So, is no one responsible for anything they do? Does anyone calmly and objectively decide to be antisocial? What is the nature and role of unconscious motivation in criminal activity?
It is vitally important that these questions be addressed. Until we can find the answers, attempts at crime prevention will be rendered ineffectual by the continuing argument between those who lay the blame for bad behaviour on social deprivation and those who regard it as an expression of personal evil. But let us beware that we do not allow our own unconscious or conscious fears to influence our analysis of this problem.
Yours sincerely,
PETER GALBRAITH
Northampton
The writer is a psychotherapist.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments