Letter: Benefits and drawbacks of electric shock therapy

Professor Hugh Freeman
Tuesday 15 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It would be very unfortunate if people who are troubled by depression, or their relatives, were to be misled by the allegations about ECT in the letter from Lucy Johnstone (14 December). Virtually every statement contained in it is without foundation.

Not only is the evidence for the efficacy of ECT in severe depression overwhelming, on the basis of scientific studies, but this is still by far the most effective single treatment for that distressing disorder. Complaints of memory loss after ECT have neither been ignored nor discounted by psychiatrists; in fact, repeated studies over nearly 50 years have failed to reveal any loss beyond the first few weeks. For many patients, memory is actually improved when their depression is relieved.

Although the value of ECT, like many other treatments in medicine, was originally discovered accidentally, its rationale is now established by research on neurotransmitters within the brain. Their level is raised by ECT, as it is by antidepressant drugs. This treatment also has an established efficacy in other less common psychiatric disorders. That different psychiatrists use it to different extents is neither surprising nor sinister, since they have to deal with very varying groups of patients, in varying circumstances.

ECT is one of the safest procedures in medicine and has relieved millions of people of untold suffering. As your own newspaper reported recently, psychological treatments such as counselling have their own drawbacks, and even dangers.

Yours etc,

HUGH FREEMAN

Editor

The British Journal

of Psychiatry

London, SW1

14 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in