Letter: Beastly artists do not need improving lessons from philistine critics

Mr Simon Williams
Monday 23 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am disappointed in you. You trot out ('A different picture when artists behave badly', 20 August) the tiresome and tired old myth that Wagner was preoccupied with Teutonic subjects: Rienzi is set in 14th-century Rome, The Flying Dutchman and the Ring cycle are drawn from Nordic legends, Tristan is a Celtic figure and Parsifal uses the Grail quest. The master's inspiration was broadly based. Hitler's love of his music does not make Wagner a proto-Nazi.

On the wider and more serious issue of the relationship between an artist's life and his work, I cannot accept that it is 'glib' to dismiss wicked or offensive conduct in considering the work, if that conduct does not inform the work.

Caravaggio's paintings do not glorify violence or incite to murder, and there is not the least breath of anti-Semitism (or any other of Wagner's numerous appalling characteristics) in his whole oeuvre. The man and his music can be and should be considered quite separately.

To judge a work by the character or conduct of its creator is a gross betrayal of the artist and of the discipline of criticism. Such 'politically correct' judgements are the last resort of the feeble-minded and risk becoming a form of censorship worthy only of philistines.

Yours faithfully,

SIMON WILLIAMS

Twickenham,

London

20 August

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in