Letter: Be they rowers or be they oarsmen?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a product of mid-20th century rowing, I have been used to 'oarsman' as the universal term for one who pulls a boat along. I wonder how many 'oarsmen' grated their teeth at your caption to the photograph of the Olympias trireme ('The good ship Democracy', 14 June) which told us 'The ship has 170 rowers'? Alas, the 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary attributes 'rowers' to Chaucer in 1374 in the extremely plausible 'Be rowers and be maryners . . . drunken by wickede drynkes', and 'oarsman' to the Weekly Register of only 1811. With great internal consistency, it defines a rower as 'one who rows, an oarsman' and an oarsman as 'one who uses oars. A rower'.
I am not unaware of the march of time whereby many ladies now row but, O Great Lexicographer, please let us speak always of 'oarsmen'. I wonder what the ladies think?
Yours,
BROADBRIDGE
House of Lords
London, SW1
14 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments