Letter: BBC's reputation for truth deserves a better guardian

M-J Hill
Sunday 28 March 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I AGREE with so much of what Neal Ascherson wrote in 'Why we are right to expect more from the BBC' (21 March). Had the financial intricacies of his company involved a politician I would have batted no more than half an eyelid. But the BBC? I can remember when, as a young typist in the British Embassy in Moscow in 1955-56, we used to take it in turns to try to transcribe the news in spite of relentless Soviet jamming. I can still recall the sense of reassurance and comfort, of something reliable and apparently indestructible in the speaker's voice as I played the tape over and over again trying to decipher the words.

Men and women have risked their freedom and their lives, and perhaps still do, to listen to the BBC. Would they do that if it were not for its reputation for truth and integrity?

Those who place themselves as guardians of the efficiency as well as of the reputation of the BBC, both at home and abroad, should do all in their power to guard and maintain that reputation. I am quite happy to be called a failure, nonentity, or psychopathically envious time-server, but the Director-General of the BBC should, like Caesar's wife, be above suspicion. The BBC is not perfect but it is unique and deserves better.

M-J Hill

London SW5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in