Letter: BBC's drive for 'grim efficiency'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Anyone with even the slightest contact with the BBC usually emerges awed by the sheer bureaucracy of the whole enterprise. From international consultants McKinsey to manager John Birt, no one has yet succeeded in imposing a Marks & Spencer solution on the corporation, ridding it of its excessive paperwork and layers of management.
John Tusa criticises the BBC for allowing a tyranny of sterile efficiency to drive out the BBC's essential qualities of creativity. He is certainly not alone in regarding the present regime as out of touch with the BBC's staff and obsessed with efficiency at the expense of effectiveness.
The BBC management seems to be making just about every mistake in the book: from making existing staff feel undervalued, to attempting to impose new values without engaging people sufficiently in the process.
One must have a degree of sympathy, though, for the senior management. It is faced with monumental complacency and an apparent resistance to new ideas that would challenge even the most dynamic and charismatic leader. What is missing, however, is a sense of a leadership that is not punitive, one willing to look at new ideas for handling change and one that demonstrates that it understands how to handle the natural resistance arising in any change process.
The test of the present management will be how far it unlocks the potential of the remaining staff, reconciles improved creativity with meaningful efficiency, and demonstrates new values that the bulk of staff can respect and emulate.
Yours faithfully,
ANDREW LEIGH
Maynard Leigh Associates
(Management Consultants)
London, SW6
15 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments