Letter: Battered women, disputed figures
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Oliver Kamm
Sir: Fran Abrams's disturbing claim ("Just imagine", 23 October) that one woman in four has suffered physical abuse from a male partner is unsupported by evidence.
The most thorough and statistically robust studies of the prevalence of domestic violence are the two representative-sample National Family Violence surveys conducted in the United States by the academics Richard Gelles and Murray Straus. They suggest that around 100,000 women a year suffer serious injury as a result of domestic disputes. That is a shocking statistic in itself, of course, but it does suggest that Ms Abrams should have been citing a battery rate of less than 1 per cent, not 25 per cent. Even on a broad definition, only 16 per cent of couples could be said to engage in violence; the great majority of such acts are minor incidents, such as pushing and jostling, that cause no physical injury, and around half of them are committed by women.
Yours faithfully,
Oliver Kamm
London, SW9
31 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments