Letter:Ban weapons but save shooting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your editorial (14 August) does you no credit, and your suggestion that the shooting community has any less sympathy than the public at large for the Dunblane parents, let alone considers them a "screaming mob", is beneath contempt.
The "gun culture" you refer to exists largely in the imaginings of the media and politicians. Most sporting shooters are no more fanatical about guns than golfers are about golf clubs, viewing them solely as equipment with which to enjoy a skilled, satisfying, and above all safe, sport, and the vast majority of handguns used for sporting purposes are not, contrary to your leader, designed "primarily to shoot people".
You state that, with legally held guns under lock and key, "only when kept and traded illegally would they pose a problem" - or, to put it another way, by savagely curtailing the innocent pastimes of one of the most law- abiding communities in the land, 99 per cent or more of firearm-related crime will remain wholly unaffected.
To demand new legislation, without even claiming or expecting it will achieve anything positive, simply because "nothing less will satisfy the public", is a shallow use of a major newspaper's leader page.
D T ARGENT
Horsham,
West Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments