Letter: Backward-looking home for Tate's modern art
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Bankside Power Station is better described as a 'mausoleum of power' rather than the 'temple' of yesterday's story ('Tate eyes river site for art museum', 2 November). It looks like a cenotaph and indeed casts a mighty gloom over its Thames-side site in central London. It presents a vertical acre of the ugliest-ever bricks to the City and to the river, unredeemed by masterful detailing. Despite some art deco styling, previously associated with high spirits, the building still casts a miasma of depression.
The station always was a flop. It operated for less than 10 years, spreading vast quantities of sulphurous fumes across the centre of the city. The taller chimney originally designed was rejected for being higher than St Paul's.
Its monstrous size blocks some 200 yards of Bankside from the river, and its back elevation is lined with an obsolescent sub-station. Behind this is an underground tank farm. The complex sterilises a large hinterland of office buildings that are themselves obsolete. Its construction was a disaster in urban planing, which its retention perpetuates.
Does the Tate propose to spearhead a joint redevelopment project to change this almighty mess into a visionary precinct, with new buildings representing the best British architectural talent, as it meant to do with its Turner Gallery? It proposes instead to camp in the machine rooms, perpetuating the blight and the muddle, and preventing state-of-the-art development. How backward-looking; how necrophilic; how very Britain of the Nineties.
Yours faithfully,
LAWRENCE HANSEN
Director
The Southwark Environment Trust
London, SE15
2 November
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments