Letter: AZT never claimed to be a miracle cure for Aids
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GIVEN the media hostility to anything scientific, you are to be congratulated for printing two scientific items (on plastics and AZT) in the Sunday Review (2 May). I hope it will not seem ungracious if I correct certain errors. First, Bakelite cannot be produced 'in a rainbow of colours'. It is restricted to black, dark brown and dark green. Second, polythene was not 'invented in the United States'. It was discovered by our very own Imperial Chemical Industries and patented in February 1936.
In the AZT article, Simon Garfield admits that 'it was never claimed to be a cure'. The remarkable thing about AZT is that it has remained the leading anti- HIV drug for seven years in spite of hugely expensive research programmes to replace it. It is hardly fair to criticise AZT for not being the miracle drug it never claimed to be and for not yet being replaced by something better.
B G Reuben
South Bank University
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments