Letter: Avoiding confusion over false candidates
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Lesley Whittaker's piece on the Liberal Democrats' frustrations over their near miss in the European election in Devon (22 June) is understandable enough, but she fails to explain why, in a prime target seat for her party, her candidate's name was not so widely known and her party's campaign was not sufficiently targeted as to ensure that the 'Literal Democrat' candidate's vote did not cause fatal electoral damage to the Lib Dems.
After all, in arguably more confusing circumstances, an 'E Heath', standing as the 'Conservative and Consult the People' candidate in 1970 against Edward Heath polled less than 1,000 votes, and in the 1982 Glasgow Hillhead by-election a second 'Roy Jenkins' stood as 'Social Democrat' candidate against the then SDP leader, and polled precisely 282 votes.
Those who argue for the registration of political parties may well be right, but the implications of this should be carefully considered. - particularly by the Liberal Democrats who, after all, went through three different names in little more than a single year.
A political carve-up by the existing major parties could well lead to draconian qualifications being required for the registration of a national party, leading to consequent ossification of parties at a time when more flexibility could well be beneficial. It would also be likely to lead to the electoral law requiring formal endorsement of a local candidate by a national party, thus enhancing and entrenching central office hegemony, which, depending on the party's national view, could enforce or inhibit realignment and electoral alliances.
Yours faithfully,
MICHAEL MEADOWCROFT
President,
The Liberal Party
London, SW1
23 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments