Letter: Asylum-seekers who fall foul of the law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your feature on Campsfield Detention Centre ('A night out in limbo', 25 April) seems to have over-simplified some aspects. Early in the text it is implied that all or most asylum-seekers end up in Campsfield or its companion establishments. In fact, less than 1.5 per cent of applicants do so.
Readers might also form the impression that all the inmates have track records beyond reproach. Many have histories of criminal activity in their own countries. Others have brought themselves to the attention of the authorities in this country, in the course of some malpractice, to be revealed as illegal immigrants. Several have been apprehended importing drugs.
The need for Campsfield may be regrettable. However it represents a responsible and pragmatic response to a phenomenal increase in asylum-seeking and the exponential increase in international crime.
Yours faithfully,
SIMON MORT
Oxford
26 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments