Letter: Ashby's expensive libel action

Mr Walter Cairns
Friday 22 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Sir: The tragic case of David Ashby's lost libel action (report, 20 December) highlights the need for alternative solutions to disputes concerning allegations made about people.

There is nothing that a libel action can do which could not be achieved by a statutory right of reply. Even if Mr. Ashby had won, the "no smoke without fire" syndrome would have ensured that, with certain people, he would always remain "guilty". A statutory right of reply, on the other hand, allows the injured party to state his/her case in full and in a prominent position in the newspaper concerned, is less expensive and less emotionally draining for all those concerned.

Also, in any confrontation between the might of a national newspaper and an individual, the latter - however prominent in public life - is invariably cast as an underdog and therefore is more inclined to receive the readers' sympathy.

Yours sincerely,

Walter Cairns

Manchester

20 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in