Letter: Art treasure sales a 'betrayal of trust'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The sale of some contents from Chevening, the official residence of the Foreign Secretary, next May 'to pay maintenance costs' ('Chevening sells contents to survive', 2 March), coupled with the sale at auction this month by the City of Manchester education committee from children's schools of 100 works by British artists - including an Augustus John and a John Piper - as confirmed by Peter Brooke, the National Heritage Secretary, in Parliament is a sad reflection on present day values across the spectrum.
It comes shortly after the Royal Holloway college has sold its seascape by Turner, to be followed shortly by a Constable and a Gainsborough. Bart's Hospital in London is contemplating selling two Hogarths, and Edinburgh University either a 17th-century landscape by Ruysdael or a 16th-century bronze by De Vries.
As the current epidemic of art sales from institutions gathers momentum, this generation's regrettable betrayal of trust by failing to conserve our cultural inheritance intact must inevitably raise serious doubts among present-day benefactors contemplating leaving their works of art for public enjoyment. Nor can their faith in the future be reassured by the reluctance of government departments (in the case of the Turner - the Charity Commission, the Attorney General and the Parliamentary Ombudsman) to intervene.
Yours faithfully,
GEORGE LEVY
H. Blairman & Sons
London, W1
2 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments