Letter: Arms deals should be public
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
SO John Major denies knowledge of the arms to Iraq scandal? Apart from the question of whether he should be regarded as a knave or a fool, the whole sorry business raises other issues, particularly the secrecy that surrounds arms deals.
As long as there is secrecy around this iniquitous trade in human misery, there will be scandals and cover-ups linked to it. Clearly, decisions about arms sales should be made in Parliament as part of a policy of genuinely 'open government'. This would ensure that the public was fully aware of the nature of the trade and of the evils it propagates.
One of the many appalling aspects of the arms trade is the linking of aid to the sale of weaponry. It is scandalous, for example, that Malaysia should have been given aid to secure lucrative arms deals for this country.
The Campaign Against the Arms Trade has suggested that Mr Major take the immediate step of introducing a register of applications for weapons exports. This would ensure time for parliamentary and public scrutiny and debate, and prevent another Iraq or Malaysian deal.
Caroline Robertson
Church Crookham, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments