Letter : Appeal court has judgment in store

Michael Cole
Thursday 23 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Michael Cole

Sir: Important facts have been obscured by the pre-arranged publicity accompanying the pantomime performance at Harrods yesterday starring two sheriff's men ("Bailiffs shop at Harrods for £130,000 debt", 21 February). The liability for costs arises from judgment in an action brought by Harrods to restrain the use of the name Harrodian. That is a name invented by Harrods and used by it for many years.

The judgment against Harrods last year is under appeal, as is Harrods' liability to pay the costs of the case. If Harrods succeeds in its appeal, it would naturally expect its legal costs and any damages that may be awarded to be paid by the defendant in the case, the Harrodian School Limited. The last published accounts of the school show that it has net liabilities of £214,000. Quite naturally, Harrods is concerned about the ability of the school to repay the trial costs should that need arise.

The question of the costs will be heard in the High Court next Monday, the appropriate place for such considerations, not the third floor of Harrods.

Yours faithfully,

MICHAEL COLE

Director of Public Affairs

Harrods

London, SW1

21 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in