Letter: Another treaty that has been ignored

Ms Janet Bloomfield
Sunday 07 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As Raymond Whitaker points out ('A dictator's deadly legacy', 5 August), North Korea's activities undermine regional security and threaten the global nuclear non-proliferation regime.

But South Korea also ignores the 1991 North/South Denuclearisation Declaration. However, instead of building its own fissile material production facilities, it ges someone else to do its dirty work. Britain. British Nuclear Fuels now admits that it is negotiating to process South Korean spent reactor fuel at THORP.

Meanwhile, Japan builds up ever-increasing stocks of plutonium to the alarm of its neighbours. Once again, Britain helps in the process.

Yet none of this activity, according to our government, breaks the existing Non-Proliferation Treaty - a treaty that Britain wants to see extended indefinitely and unamended in 1995.

No wonder that CND wants a short-term NPT extension only while a complete global ban on nuclear weapons, along the lines of the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, is worked out.

Hardly a radical proposal since, under Article VI of the treaty, we have been committed to it for 25 years. Just one more treaty obligation that has been completely ignored.

Yours in peace,

JANET BLOOMFIELD

Chair

Campaign for Nuclear

Disarmament

London, N7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in