Letter: Animals are not sacks of flour - and British lamb cannot be French
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Joanna Lumley's open letter to Gillian Shephard (20 June) underlines the enormous trade in living animals carried on within the EU without adequate protection within the law and even less resource for implementing the law.
That long-distance transport of farm livestock may be associated with cruelty, injury, disease and death is well documented. What is less well understood is why the trade is economically viable, since it is possible to transport carcasses for a fraction of the cost with less damage to the end product and far less animal suffering.
While there are various factors such as exchange rate and production efficiency which make it profitable to produce an animal in one country and sell it in another, these factors apply equally to the live animal and the carcass trade.
One important factor which underpins the live rather than the carcass trade is that French retailers can claim that British lamb, imported live into France and killed in a French abattoir, is 'home produced'. For this the French housewife is willing to pay a substantial premium.
If this misleading and spurious claim were stopped, the economic viability of live lamb shipment would be reduced and a great deal of unnecessary suffering prevented.
Yours faithfully,
R. S. ANDERSON
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool
Leahurst Neston,
South Wirral
20 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments