Letter: An unacceptable anti-strike voice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Calls for strikes in essential services to be banned are not new, neither is this the first time that Charles Hanson has expended his energies in this direction ('Keep rolling back union power', 8 September).
In 1988 he argued in Hobart Paper 110 Striking Out Strikes, published by the Thatcherite Institute of Economic Affairs, that the right to strike, in any sector, was an unnecessary hindrance to British industry and should be abolished.
So much for the standards set by the International Labour Organisation and accepted by the major industrial democracies.
Mr Hanson's current call for the abolition of the right to strike in essential services might be more acceptable were it tempered by a proposal, recently suggested by the Institute of Directors, that disputes in these sectors be referred to binding arbitration. Otherwise public sector employees, in common with domestic users of the privatised utilities, will be left to the whims of the not-so- free market.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS ROSE
London, NW5
9 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments