Letter: Amritsar apology
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: If there is an Indian demand that Britain (and the Queen during her current visit) apologise for the Amritsar massacre, it might be noted that in 1920, after inquiry, the Government of India condemned General Dyer, whose troops fired on the crowd: warning should have been given, the continuation of firing was indefensible, the wounded should have been tended. The loss of life was regretted and compensation promised.
The Secretary of State for India, Edwin Montagu, declared that Dyer had "offended against every canon of civilised conduct"; the lack of a warning was "inexcusable"; failure to tend the wounded was "an omission from his obvious duty"; he was "not entitled to select for condign punishment an unarmed crowd which ... had committed no act of violence".
Montagu's words must be regarded as an apology already and rightly made.
PETER ROBB
London N1
The writer is Professor of the History of India at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments