Letter: Amazing decision to reject Channel 5 bid
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Independent Television Commission's decision not to award the licence for the proposed Channel 5 to the sole bidder - a consortium of Thames Television and FiveTV Ltd - is amazing ('Channel 5 on hold as Thames bid fails', 19 December).
Its quoted reasons are: 1) the questioning of our business plan; and 2) the doubting of our investor commitment.
Of course, I am an interested party as the vice-chairman of FiveTV, but let me briefly answer these two points.
Three years ago I brought in City TV of Toronto and its originator, Moses Znaimer, as our partners in FiveTV. It was his formula on which a large part of our application was based. Today City TV is the No 1 station in a 40-station market and is an increasingly profitable broadcaster even in these very difficult times.
Second, we told the ITC that we had Thames Television (majority owned by EMI) and Time Warner (the world's largest entertainment company) with a combined commitment of more than 70 per cent. Our merchant bankers had indicated that the remaining money was available, including strong interest from America's CapCity/ ABC network and other major names.
We had a plan to give Britain a different, city-based television service, which both advertisers and many members of the public wanted. I believe city-based broadcasting will come and we intend to continue to campaign for it.
Last year the Radio Authority, in awarding Classic FM its licence, allowed a period after the award for Classic FM to finalise its financial backing. Why weren't we?
Yours etc,
RICHARD PRICE
Vice-chairman, FiveTV Ltd
London, NW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments