Letter: Alternative route to electoral reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report on Liberal Democrat terms for an alliance with Labour suggests that if the two parties are to form an alliance to fight for electoral reform at the next election, they will have first to agree on the main political issues of the day ('Lib Dems set out terms for pact', 8 April). Since that looks like an impossible task, electoral reform looks like a dead duck - unless an alternative approach can be found that requires the two parties to agree on electoral reform and nothing else. One solution might be an electoral pact along the following lines:
1. For the next election, the two parties would adopt a common programme consisting of only one item, electoral reform of whatever kind they together choose.
2. For this election only, constituencies would be divided between the two parties so as to ensure that in each constituency only a Liberal Democrat candidate or a Labour candidate fought for the common programme, never both. The simplest way to divide the constituencies between the two parties would be according to which party had more votes at the last election.
3. The parties would promise in their joint programme that, if elected, they would form a coalition government that would introduce an electoral reform bill and nothing else; and they would promise that once the electoral reform act was on the statute book, they would ask the Queen to dissolve Parliament.
4. At the resulting election held under the reformed system, the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party would fight each other, and other parties, in the usual way.
For those who want electoral reform to be seriously considered in this country, a point in favour of this scheme is that it would turn the next election into a close approximation to a referendum on electoral reform.
Yours faithfully,
R. R. NEILD
Trinity College
Cambridge
9 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments