LETTER: Allies committed war crimes, too
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Andy Clarkson
Sir: Why do the American and British governments still refuse to apologise even to the ordinary people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for engulfing their cities in the holocaust of atomic warfare?
After all, before the war both governments went on record to describe the German bombing of civilians in Guernica during the Spanish civil war as morally repugnant. By the end of the war, they must have changed their minds. Fifty years on, can we conclude from their continuing refusal to apologise for Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the aerial bombardment of civilians is now excluded from the category of "war crimes" (principally because it is the archetypal Western act of war); and they have every intention of dropping the bombs again should it prove necessary? In other words, who decides what is a war crime which should at least be apologised for and what is not?
Yours faithfully,
Andy Clarkson
London, E8
14 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments