Letter: Alarming or alarmist? The statistics of ozone depletion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report on the thinning of the ozone layer over Britain makes sober reading ('Ozone layer over Britain shrinks', 23 April). It ought to emphasise to all of us how ur-
gent the task is of phasing out
the use of ozone-destroying substances on the most rapid timetable possible.
The Government, however, seems to remain complacent. In February, when it was already becoming clear that ozone levels were dropping abnormally, the Secretary of State for the Environment told me in a parliamentary answer that levels were 'within previously observed ranges for the time of year'. They weren't; and the Nasa evidence now demonstrates that all too clearly.
Still, however, the Government seems prepared to go along with inadequate targets for tackling the problem. It appears to agree with a 2014 date for the final phase-out of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), which is too late. It seems to believe that a 50 per cent reduction in methyl bromide is sufficient, whereas other countries are opting for a complete ban. And it is not taking sufficiently stringent action to prevent the release of existing CFCs into the atmosphere from industrial cooling units and refrigeration plants.
None of this demonstrates the sense of urgency that is required. Inadequate targets, insufficient regulation and bland complacency are not going to protect the environmental needs of our poor fragile world. It is high time the Government woke up to the sheer scale and importance of the problem.
Yours sincerely,
CHRIS SMITH
MP for Islington South and
Finsbury (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
23 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments