Letter: Alan Budd is no Michael Fish
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALAN BUDD defends the forecasting record of the Treasury as if he is an economic equivalent of Michael Fish. Weather prediction deals with forces which it makes no pretence of causing or affecting. The Treasury deals with human factors; it is responsible for shaping policy by acting intelligently upon them. Amid economic devastation not felt for more than 50 years, for which the Treasury bears a large share of guilt, how can Alan Budd pretend that it is nothing to do with him?
With far fewer reasons to feel responsible, Michael Fish was publicly rueful about the hurricane. Does the Treasury really believe it is nothing more than a financial Met Office? That would certainly explain much that otherwise defies comprehension.
Chris Boothroyd
Morpeth, Northumberland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments