Letter: Air-drop food into Zaire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Air-drop food into Zaire
Sir, The withdrawal of aid workers from and the cancellation of a food delivery to Zaire (reports, 27 October) highlight the risks involved when humanitarian agencies endeavour to provide food relief by conventional means to a disturbed and violent region.
Refugee camps create disease, ferment agitation, and assist in the breakdown of an already strained community.
They also serve as an easily identifiable and vulnerable focus for those who would wish harm on their inhabitants.
To provision them requires an adequate and secure airfield, a reliable and safe transport system and an unthreatened and incorruptible local labour force. All these essential elements are missing in the Great Lakes region.
Rather than persist in "soup-kitchen" solutions, aid agencies should now concentrate on air-dropping supplies to those at risk. Nutritionally enriched individual-packaged, supplementary diets exist which are both inexpensive to manufacture and cost-effective to deliver.
The proven ability to drop these accurately to needy groups does away with the necessity to uproot communities and thus keeps them both dispersed, which is safer and less disruptive, and in their villages, where they can continue to tend their crops.
DAVID CHILDS
Director, Leonard Cheshire Department of Conflict Recovery
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments