Letter: Aintree repeat of 1849
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Following Saturday's debacle at Aintree, I thought your readers might care to know that this has happened before in the fascinating history of the Grand National.
In 1849, in the 11th running of the Grand National, there was a similar false start to the race, which coincidentally also took place in rain and wind. The winner, Peter Simple, won the race from a false start. The decision was allowed to stand.
On that occasion, Lord Sefton called the horses back but the leaders had gone on and the others followed suit.
The starter, finding the field gone beyond recall, lowered his flag. In the shambles which followed, three horses died and Peter Simple, with a jockey called Cunningham on board, went on to win the race.
Knowing that it has happened before might be of slight comfort to Mr Brown and other Aintree officials. At the very least, the parallel events of 1849 should be of interest to historians of the turf.
Yours sincerely,
ANNE SHERER
Lexden,
Essex
5 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments