Letter: Aids 'myth' is a grim reality
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a gay man concerned about the well-being of other gay men during the Aids epidemic, I was distressed to read Christopher Spence's letter (4 December) attacking your very sensible leading article ('Realism about Aids', 2 December) and the 'myth of 'high-risk groups' '.
While all sexually active people are indeed at risk of HIV infection if they practise unsafe sex, they are certainly not all at equal risk. Because of the relatively high prevalence of HIV among gay men, particularly in London, a gay man having unsafe sex stands a much greater risk of contracting or passing on HIV than virtually anyone else. To this extent, gay men are indeed a high-risk group in the UK. Attempts to draw comparisons with other countries with very different epidemics are simply misleading.
The benevolent concept of high-risk groups only becomes problematic if it is abused as a tool to single out particular social constituencies for prejudice and blame. Acknowledging the existence of high-risk groups enables prevention resources to be properly directed to where they are most needed. Dismissing their existence as a 'myth' can only perpetuate the neglect of safer sex campaigns for those most at risk, and is itself likely to cost lives.
Yours sincerely,
EDWARD KING
London, W2
5 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments