Letter: Aid that benefits the giver

E. Anne Lacey
Sunday 20 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I READ with dismay and embarrassment Chris Blackhurst's article 'Help to the world - who gains?' (13 February). For years we have known that our overseas aid budget is pathetically small, and getting smaller. We have also known that much of the aid is tied to trade deals which benefit ourselves at least as much as the developing country, and encourage an arms trade, itself of dubious morality.

We now find that a handful of British companies are winning a disproportionate number of contracts for overseas projects, so that some of the money allocated to overseas development actually returns to Britain via profits paid to shareholders.

Surely this is a bigger scandal than the sexual misdemeanours of MPs? Would it not be more appropriate for the media to devote its time to asking embarrassing questions about these matters?

It is time we developed a sense of proportion. We are comparatively rich as a nation, and should be showing genuine concern for those who are unable to share our prosperity. This would mean giving without looking to serve our own interests in the process.

E Anne Lacey

Rotherham, Yorks

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in