Letter: Ageing mothers, fatherless children

Dr Roger Crisp
Thursday 06 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: So the French health minister finds the idea of artificially producing children from older mothers 'absolutely shocking' ('Pressure grows for curb on fertility treatments', 4 January). We should not forget how shocking the emancipation of slaves and women appeared to racists and sexists in previous ages. Philippe Douste-Blazy's ageist gut reaction is no different.

He suggests that a child of 18 does not 'deserve' a mother of 80. What can it mean to say that a child 'deserves' a parent of any age? If any child were not to have the parents they do have, they would not be the child they are.

Perhaps the minister means that it is somehow bad for a child to have an older mother. But if I were a happy and fulfilled child of 18 with a mother of 80, I should not look kindly upon a political proposal that would prevent others like me coming into existence and which could be supported by nothing other than prejudice.

Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health, is a member of a government committed to extending the freedom of the individual from state intervention. For her to follow any French lead in doing just the opposite by legislating against fertility treatment for older women would not only be intolerable. It would also be hypocritical.

Yours faithfully,

ROGER CRISP

Fellow in Philosophy

St Anne's College

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in