Letter: Africans need more than space
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Richard Dowden, and John Quarshie Awuah ('Overpopulation is not Africa's problem', 5 September; letter, 10 September) are mistaken. Africa may not be 'overpopulated' in the sense of having more people than carrying capacity; but the aerial impression of an 'empty' continent is wholly misleading.
First, parts of Africa are far from empty - Kenya was a land- surplus country 40 years ago, but is now land-scarce. Second, the amount of space, even of cultivable land, is hardly relevant. Agriculture needs investment in infrastructure and research; and productivity today, whether in agriculture, manufacturing or services, needs human investment in health and education.
With populations doubling in 25 years, African governments simply cannot keep up with public services; nor could the private sector, even under improved economic policies, produce adequate employment with rising incomes for such fast-growing numbers. People do not live by space alone.
Equally, there are problems at the individual level. Mothers who bear the average number of children in Africa stand about a one-in-20 chance of dying in childbirth; they will spend about one-third of their lives in pregnancy and lactation, with consequently diminished life opportunities. Children, especially girls, with large numbers of siblings have reduced chances of schooling; if they are born at short birth intervals, as is common when family size is large, they have reduced chances even of living into adulthood.
The message that the industrial countries have been delivering in Cairo has been a subtle one: they have not been saying, as the distorted versions put about by Catholic and other critics have alleged, that family planning will solve Africa's, or anywhere else's, problems. They have been saying that one-quarter of births in the Third World are unwanted by the parents, and that family planning should be extended to those who already want it and cannot get it.
That implies, though, that three-quarters of births are wanted. For most parents, improvements in other aspects of life - child mortality going down, education and employment rising - will be needed before they take to small families.
Yours,
ROBERT CASSEN
London, NW3
11 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments