Letter: Advice on the future of the Queen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Matthew Symonds ('John Major's duty to his Queen', 10 September) is to be congratulated on his sensible suggestions for reforming the monarchy. However his ideas - that the Civil List should be restricted and that the Queen's immunity from taxation on her private income should be ended - do not address the central issue. The real question is: how can democratic people living in the last decade of the 20th century possibly justify the principle of heredity as the basis for selecting their head of state?
The fact is, we cannot. So, instead of tinkering with the system, in an attempt to keep the old monarchical show on the road, we should instead start now the process of thinking about Britain as a republic. We need to think about how a transition to a republic can come about; about which type of republic (US? French? German? Irish?); about how republican principles such as the separation of powers, the separation of church and state and the entrenching of citizens' rights, can be practically implemented; and about how it all fits into the evolving institutions of Europe.
Planning for this necessary and inevitable modernisation of our constitution should be one of the primary tasks of this generation of politicians. However, MPs have been strangely dumb on the question of criticising (let alone replacing) the monarchy - even to the point of agreeing, in this 'forum of the nation', to a 'code of silence'. However, now that public opinion is changing, we should pressure our legislators to institute a great debate on the issue. In this great debate I hope they will resist Mr Symonds's tinkering.
Sincerely,
STEPHEN HASELER
Chairman, Republic
London, W14
11 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments