Letter: Advantages of the scrapped fine system
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Home Secretary's decision simply to dispense with the unit fine system ('Earnings-related fines scrapped', 14 May), rather than reform its acknowledged flaws, is greatly to be regretted.
Unless all magistrates' courts exercise their discretion to continue the system in non-statutory form, the result is likely to be a rapid escalation in the number of people who are received into prison for fine default.
The main problem with the unit fine was, of course, of the Government's own making. It was the Government itself that quadrupled the maximum value of each unit compared with the four highly successful pilot projects. The Home Secretary's assertion that it was not possible to revert to the procedure that applied in the experiments is wholly unconvincing.
The way in which a fixed monetary penalty discriminates against the poor and in favour of the well-to-do is of course the central dilemma of the fine. For this reason, many countries both in Europe and in Latin America have developed ways in which fines are imposed in multiples of the offender's income. The system has successfully operated in Scandinavia, for example, for more than 60 years. What is it about this country, that a similar mechanism is abandoned after just six months?
Yours faithfully,
STEPHEN SHAW
Director
Prison Reform Trust
London, N1
14 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments