LETTER: Accountability for all

Dr Roger Booker
Sunday 29 October 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE establishment of an audit culture in the public sector does not have to imply the constant vigilance and supervision referred to in your editorial last week ("Prisoners of Tory mistrust", 22 October). It can quite happily co-exist in a culture where management does assume that staff operate on the basis of values additional to rational self-interest. However, it requires that managers perceive their role as primarily to support staff rather than to control them.

To achieve this, the defining nature of the relationship management has with staff must be compatible with the nature of the relationship staff are expected to have with their clients or service users. If this congruence of style is perceived by everyone as fundamental, the establishment of audit mechanisms can be understood as a necessary, but collective, responsibility in accountability for the use of public resources.

Audit mechanisms are, nevertheless, an exercise in monitoring and evaluation of performance which is emotionally threatening; all the more reason to contain them within a framework which is supportive rather than the sticks and carrots favoured by the Government.

Dr Roger Booker

London SW18

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in