Letter: Academic standards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Patten has refused to meet representatives of the universities to discuss this year's pay settlement (report, 3 August). He says it would serve no useful purpose. Mr Patten is right.
Professor Sutherland's question 'Who manages the universities?' stretches far wider than questions of pay. Universities must operate academic standards: if not, they are trading under a fraudulent prospectus. Only academics can judge these standards.
During the past 10 years, government attempts to reduce unit costs have time and again overridden academic judgement of standards. The Government has imposed an arbitrary time limit on the PhD, and it attempted in the Further and Higher Education Bill to shorten the length of the BA. In its pressure for unfunded expansion, it is attempting to override academic judgement on library resources, teaching methods and syllabuses. Most seriously, it has reduced student support below subsistence level, so undergraduates without rich parents regularly have to earn money during term.
Academics, often unconsciously, have lowered their requirements for work to what their students are able to do, so that an Upper Second in 1992 may involve less work than a Lower Second
in 1984. If we cannot regain control of academic standards, we cannot continue to call ourselves universities.
It is time for universities to consider following the example of the University of Buckingham, which is entirely privately funded and refuses to accept any money from the state. We should not duck the consequences of such a policy: it would probably mean that only two universities would survive south of the border. The question we should consider is whether we would rather have two universities or none.
Yours sincerely,
RUSSELL
House of Lords
London, SW1
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments