LETTER : Abuse of statistics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms H. J. Bowman
Sir: It is true that exposure rates of children are probably much lower nowadays, as suggested by Professor O'Carroll (letter, 3 August). However the next step in the argument about statistics on child safety is whether exposure rates have any bearing on the incidence of strangers murdering children.
It could be the case that the people who do these things are a tiny, but fairly constant, proportion of the general population. If these people experience a compulsion to abuse and murder children, then they will seek out their victims anyway. The only difference a lower exposure rate will make is in the ease with which they find their victims.
We need to be able to identify the people with these compulsions before they commit crimes - at which time there will still be public sympathy for them - and then find methods to restrain and change their abusive obsessions.
Yours faithfully,
Hilarie Bowman
Ham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments