Letter: A white elephant lacking sensitivity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Jonathan Glancey's praise of Norman Foster's Royal Academy modification (10 February) as a 'small masterpiece of sensitive modern intervention' prompts me to question this 'sensitivity' from a user-specific rather than general aesthetic viewpoint. I refer especially to the 'magnificent stairway and glass lift' providing access to the Sackler Galleries.
I can assure him that those of the public who dislike heights find negotiating these impediments such an unnerving experience they have no spare capacity with which to appreciate any inherent 'magnificence'. Instead they dwell upon what they perceive as the gross arrogance and insensitivity of such a design. To watch the ground recede while trapped in the equivalent of an upturned spirit level, or to try desperately to ignore the view to the floor between slatted glass stairs seem particularly confrontational methods of negotiating vertical space.
When public buildings, however 'sensitively' conceived in terms of superstructure, fail to perform their prime function sympathetically for even a small proportion of the general public, they have failed; their status then becomes that of aesthetic white elephants, merely reflecting the narcissistic isolation of their creators.
Yours faithfully,
DIANA WELLS
Liss, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments