Letter: A tactical vote is a negative vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was both saddened and somewhat amused by Bruce Kent's letter (21 April) attacking Vanessa Redgrave for her intention to vote Liberal Democrat.
It is sad to see Bruce Kent reduced to supporting "tactical" voting. I admired him as a passionate and articulate campaigner for CND in the Eighties who put principles before pragmatism and played a prominent role in the opposition to Conservative defence policies.
Tactical voting is better described as negative voting, where voters are asked to put their views to one side and vote to stop another candidate from winning. It rests on a series of questionable assumptions about voting behaviour and the ability of forecasters such as Mr Kent (and Mystic Meg, perhaps) to predict the outcome in any constituency.
ROBERT MEADOWCROFT
London E10
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments