Letter: A tactical stratagem that could bring about a Conservative defeat at the next general election
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You state in your leading article 'A well-earned kicking, but not much more' (8 May) that Liberal Democrats and Labour must find a way of acting in combination if the Conservatives are to lose the next general election. Perhaps the following solution could beadopted?
In any seat where there was a majority of 12,000 or under at the last general election and where the third party gained fewer than 10,000 votes, the third party would agree not to put up a candidate for one general election only. A clear explanation of this strategem would be offered to the electorate in the seats affected by this agreement.
In the light of the very intelligent tactical voting on 6 May, it is doubtful whether the voters would complain. The dedicated activists in the affected wards would be free to go to another seat to ensure that their candidate was elected there.
The parliament thus elected would then have the length of one parliament only to come up with a better system for the future, knowing that if they failed to do so, the parties would revert to current election practice for all subsequent elections. A similar scheme could be piloted at the local elections in 1997, at which time local parties agree to see whether it is a workable solution.
Yours sincerely,
FRANCES BENNIE
Camberley,
Surrey
8 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments