Letter: A remarried Prince and the church
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I can see no reason why the remarriage of the Prince should by itself compromise his eventual status as Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith. Such an event would no doubt be distasteful to many of my Anglican co-religionists. Others might welcome it as preferable to the present situation which encourages scurrilous rumour. However, the Prince's remarriage would have no legal effect on church-state relations.
A church which was founded by the frequently married Henry VIII, which accepted the accession of the divorced George I, and which turned a blind eye to the many infidelities of the Hanoverians, is in no position to adopt an ultra-pure attitude. A substantial number of clergy are today themselves divorced and remarried.
There might be difficulties over who might conduct the marriage service. But the Princess Royal has set a Scottish precedent which could no doubt be followed.
Disestablishment should be decided on its merits. As a major constitutional change - at least for England - any proposal should be the subject of a referendum.
STEPHEN G LINSTEAD
Solihull, West Midlands
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments